Archive for April, 2009

Mayo Clinic to Offer Free Personal Health Record Option – With a Twist

Tuesday, April 21st, 2009

PNG version of this image
Image via Wikipedia
Today the Mayo Clinic launched a no-cost web site that will allow users to create personal health records (PHRs) using Microsoft’s HealthVault system to store PHR information for anyone who wishes to use it.

Unlike other PHR offerings out there right now (e.g., Google Health and Revolution Health), the “Mayo Clinic Health Manager”, as it is called, will offer customizable information for users. Instead of serving merely as a repository for your personal health information, Health Manager can be configured to offer checkup reminders, suggest individual-specific health screenings, and more.

You can visit the Mayo Clinic Health Manager web site href="https://healthmanager.mayoclinic.com/">here.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Personal Health Records – Watch the Errors

Wednesday, April 15th, 2009

Image representing Google Health as depicted i...
Image via CrunchBase
Great article that appeared in the Boston Globe regarding errors within Personal Health Records generated by Google Health: “Electronic Health Records Raise Doubt

Variations in how physicians describe diagnoses and order laboratory tests, as well as imprecisions in the coding used for payer billing, make it difficult for an automated systems such as Google Health to create an accurate health record from an individual’s existing health records.

A Personal Health Record should in general facilitate increased safety and the quality of care you receive across multiple providers, and especially in an emergent care setting in which the attending physician may know next to nothing about your medical history. But as the article points out, a Personal Health Record that is full of errors may hurt you more than it helps you.

My personal view is that PHRs are definitely a step in the right direction, and over time they will probably become a mainstay in a new era of efficient and quality healtcare delivery. But early adopters of Personal Health Records–whether created through Google Health or another service–should proceed with caution.

  Subscribe in a reader

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Getting the Federal EHR Incentive Dollars – What You Can Do Now

Monday, April 13th, 2009

flag-dollarUnder the American Reinvestment and Recovery Act (ARRA), healthcare providers will receive an estimated $30 Billion worth of incentives and reimbursements tied to their adoption and use of Electronic Health Records (EHRs). By anyone’s standards, this is not a small chunk of change. At the small end of the scale, individual physicians could receive as much as $60,000 over time, and larger hospitals sevaral million dollars over time.

Except for the largest hospitals and clinic groups, healthcare providers have been reluctant to move substantially toward a paperless environment for many reasons, chief among them, prohibitive cost (initial cost, cost over time, and a questionable return on investment). With broader policy objectives in mind, Congress sought to address the cost side of the equation through the EHR incentives contained in ARRA. With all of this money available, we would expect to see healthcare providers beating down the doors of EHR providers. But they aren’t–at least not yet. Here’s why.

Uncertainty – ARRA attached eligibility criteria to the EMR incentives and reimbursements, but it did not define all criteria with precision. For example, we know that a healthcare provider must demonstrate “meaningful use” of its “certified” EHR system in order to qualify for funding, and that “meaningful use” includes both EHR system attributes, as well as deployed use by a provider. We’ve been given a vague understanding of the required system attributes (e.g., e-prescribe, order entry, interoperability requirements), but we do not yet have a comprehensive list or definition. The same is true of the certification requirement.

Moving Ahead in the Face of Uncertainty – If you are looking at buying your first EHR system, or expanding your existing EHR system–in either case, with a view to securing federal reimbursement dollars–you have to get over your fear of the uncertain and unknown. Because of the aggressive adoption timeframes established, you do not have the luxury of time to indulge in decision paralysis. You have to start your planning process now.

Strategy – Instead of focusing on what you do NOT know with certainty at the moment, focus on what you DO know with some degree of certainty. Second, transfer as much “uncertainty risk” as possible to others.

For example, we know with certainty now that your qualifying EHR system must include electronic prescribing capability and automated order entry. If you are buying a new EHR system, or you are attempting to qualify your existing EHR system, you will need these functional capabilities. The same is true of the interoperabity feature. We don’t know exactly what sort of interoperability will be required, but we know some form of interoperability will be required.

Risk Transfer – Realize that EHR vendors are experiencing the same pain as you regarding the uncertainty over qualifying criteria for EHR systems. And just like you, they’re not in a postition to sit on their hands until the regulatory dust settles.

Most EMR vendors will be willing to extend broad assurances and warranties regarding their products’ future compliance with EHR qualifying criteria as they are handed down over time. If you ask for these types of assurances and warranties from your candiate EHR vendors, you will probably get them.

Focusing on what you know with certainty at present, and realizing that you can transfer a good deal of uncertainy risk to your EHR vendor, might allow you to begin a meaningful EHR system planning process now.

Stay Informed – Watch for regulatory developments and pronouncements as they are handed down in the coming weeks and months. If you don’t have time to track these on your own, plug into the many free resources out there. Chances are good that many of the professional organizations you already belong to are tracking this information for you. Think about subscribing to their RSS feeds or consolidated weekly updates.

Role of Consultants – If you have a solo practice, or you’re part of a small group practice, you may not have time to investigate your EHR options. If this is your situation, think about hiring a consultant to evaluate your practice vis-a-vis the EHR options available to you. Many good HIT consultants will conduct a “needs analysis” and make recommendations for a smallish fee.

  Subscribe in a reader

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

HIT Policy Committee – Additional Appointments

Monday, April 13th, 2009

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) has appointed Paul Egerman, chair and CEO at eScription Inc., Needham, Mass.

House Minority Leader John Boehner (R-Ohio) has appointed Gayle Harrell of Stuart, Fla., a former member of the Florida House of Representatives.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) has appointed Frank Nemec, M.D., a Las Vegas-based gastroenterologist.

Previously appointed:

Christine Bechtel, vice president, National Partnership for Woman and Families

Arthur Davidson, director, Public Health Informatics, Denver Public Health Department; director, Denver Center for Public Health Preparedness; medical epidemiologist; director, HIV/AIDS Surveillance, City and County of Denver

Adam Clark, research and policy director, Lance Armstrong Foundation

Marc Probst, chief information officer, Intermountain Healthcare

Paul Tang, vice president and chief medical information officer, Palo Alto Medical Foundation

Scott White, assistant director, technology project director, 1199 SEIU Training and Employment Fund

LaTanya Sweeney, director, Data Privacy Lab, Carnegie Mellon University

Neil Calman, president and chief executive officer, Institute for Family Health

Connie Delaney, dean, University of Minnesota School of Nursing

Charles Kennedy, vice president, Health Information Technology, Wellpoint

Judith Faulkner, founder, CEO, president and chairman of board, Epic Systems

David Lansky, president and CEO, Pacific Business Group on Health

David Bates, medical director for clinical and quality analysis, Partners HealthCare/Brigham and Women’s Hospital

Healthcare Information Technology Standards Panel (ANSI) – Upcoming Webinar

Saturday, April 11th, 2009

The Healthcare Information Technology Standards Panel will be hosting a free webinar on April 16, 2009.

Click here for more information.

Healthcare Information Technology Policy Committee – Appointments

Thursday, April 9th, 2009

Pursuant to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA), the Comptroller General has appointed 13 members to the HIT Policy Committee.  An additional seven members will be appointed by the Secretary of Health and Human Services, the Majority and Minority leaders of the Senate, and the Speaker and Minority leader of the House of Representatives. The President can appoint other members as representatives of relevant federal agencies.

Those appointed thus far:

Christine Bechtel, vice president, National Partnership for Woman and Families

Arthur Davidson, director, Public Health Informatics, Denver Public Health Department; director, Denver Center for Public Health Preparedness; medical epidemiologist; director, HIV/AIDS Surveillance, City and County of Denver

Adam Clark, research and policy director, Lance Armstrong Foundation

Marc Probst, chief information officer, Intermountain Healthcare

Paul Tang, vice president and chief medical information officer, Palo Alto Medical Foundation

Scott White, assistant director, technology project director, 1199 SEIU Training and Employment Fund

LaTanya Sweeney, director, Data Privacy Lab, Carnegie Mellon University

Neil Calman, president and chief executive officer, Institute for Family Health

Connie Delaney, dean, University of Minnesota School of Nursing

Charles Kennedy, vice president, Health Information Technology, Wellpoint

Judith Faulkner, founder, CEO, president and chairman of board, Epic Systems

David Lansky, president and CEO, Pacific Business Group on Health

David Bates, medical director for clinical and quality analysis, Partners HealthCare/Brigham and Women’s Hospital

Healthcare Information Technology Standards Panel

Thursday, April 2nd, 2009

Chairman’s Teleconference, April 2, 2009 – I participated today in a Chairman’s Teleconference for the Healthcare Information Technology Standards Panel (HITSP).

You can learn more about the HITSP here.

The Teleconference included the attached document.

You can view the entire HITSP Documents Library here.

America’s Agenda – Health Care Summit Conversations

Wednesday, April 1st, 2009

America’s health care thought leaders share their vision for health care in the 21st Century. “A shared vision with the potential to drive the health care reform that Americans want.”

If health care reform is important to you, and you’ll be in the Madison area on April 7, don’t miss this event.

April 07, 2009 Summit, Sponsored by the University of Wisconsin Law School, Edgewater Hotel, Madison, WI.

You can find more details here.