The Healthcare Information Technology Standards Panel will be hosting a free webinar on April 16, 2009.
Click here for more information.
The Healthcare Information Technology Standards Panel will be hosting a free webinar on April 16, 2009.
Click here for more information.
Pursuant to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA), the Comptroller General has appointed 13 members to the HIT Policy Committee. An additional seven members will be appointed by the Secretary of Health and Human Services, the Majority and Minority leaders of the Senate, and the Speaker and Minority leader of the House of Representatives. The President can appoint other members as representatives of relevant federal agencies.
Those appointed thus far:
Christine Bechtel, vice president, National Partnership for Woman and Families
Arthur Davidson, director, Public Health Informatics, Denver Public Health Department; director, Denver Center for Public Health Preparedness; medical epidemiologist; director, HIV/AIDS Surveillance, City and County of Denver
Adam Clark, research and policy director, Lance Armstrong Foundation
Marc Probst, chief information officer, Intermountain Healthcare
Paul Tang, vice president and chief medical information officer, Palo Alto Medical Foundation
Scott White, assistant director, technology project director, 1199 SEIU Training and Employment Fund
LaTanya Sweeney, director, Data Privacy Lab, Carnegie Mellon University
Neil Calman, president and chief executive officer, Institute for Family Health
Connie Delaney, dean, University of Minnesota School of Nursing
Charles Kennedy, vice president, Health Information Technology, Wellpoint
Judith Faulkner, founder, CEO, president and chairman of board, Epic Systems
David Lansky, president and CEO, Pacific Business Group on Health
David Bates, medical director for clinical and quality analysis, Partners HealthCare/Brigham and Women’s Hospital
Chairman’s Teleconference, April 2, 2009 – I participated today in a Chairman’s Teleconference for the Healthcare Information Technology Standards Panel (HITSP).
You can learn more about the HITSP here.
The Teleconference included the attached document.
You can view the entire HITSP Documents Library here.
Interesting post by David C. Kibbe over at The Health Care Blog entitled “Why Clinical Groupware May Be the Next Big Thing in Health IT”. You can view the post here.
Could the Clinical Groupware movement produce meaningful small scale optimization of health information (less expensive, easier to use, rich portability) that would replace today’s large scale mayhem (prohibitively expensive, difficult to use and maintain, no portability)?
Sound off below. You DO NOT HAVE TO REGISTER in order to leave a comment. If you do not see a COMMENTS WINDOW below, click on this post’s title above.
The California HealthCare Foundation and Forrester Group have just released the following issues brief: “Lessons from Amazon for Health Care and Social Service Agencies”.
In my opinion, if we’re going to make any rapid progress toward meaningful exchange of health care information, including interoperability considerations, we need to continue to think along these lines. What do you think?
You can view the document here.
Sound off below. You DO NOT HAVE TO REGISTER in order to leave a comment. If you do not see a COMMENTS WINDOW below, click on this post’s title above.
The Certification Commission for Health Information Technology (CCHIT) came under fire again in February. Blogs were buzzing about its board’s conflicts of interest and the fact that its certification process favors large EMR vendors (because only they can afford the hefty certification fees).
You can find some of these posts and comments on the Clinical IT Blog, The Health Care Blog, and the Health Care Renewal Blog.
So, What Do You Think? – Is CCHIT too conflicted to do a proper job of certifying EMR vendor offerings? Should CCHIT revise is certification fees (lower fees for all vendors, adopt scaled fees tied to trailing-year vendor revenue, etc.), thereby leveling the playing field for EMR vendors? Is all of this discussion moot because CCHIT is now irrelevant (ONCHIT and NIST will take the lead to develop HIT infrastructure and EMR certification standards)?
Sound off below. You DO NOT HAVE TO REGISTER in order to leave a comment. If you do not see a COMMENTS WINDOW below, click on this post’s title above.
Sierra Systems (British Columbia) has issued a white paper comparing the national health care information technology initiatives of Canada and the United States. Worth a read.
You can view the white paper here.