Archive for the ‘Healthcare IT’ Category
Friday, February 13th, 2009
Click here to learn more about EMR Match™.
Not Like the Others – If you have tried other EMR selection tools or evaluators, you may have been disappointed for any number of reasons: 1) you thought the tool was objective and unbiased, but you found later that it is sponsored by an EMR vendor or multi-vendor reseller; 2) the selection criteria were too few or too many; or 3) your search for an EMR vendor was not narrowed sufficiently or it was narrowed too much. Your inital disappointment may have led to outright frustration in the form of unsolicited calls from EMR vendor salespersons.
EMRmatch is different. VERY different! EMRmatch has no ties to EMR software or ASP vendors and does not accept any commission, referral or finder’s fee from any EMR vendor or reseller. EMRmatch is entirely objective and unbiased. Further, the classification criteria within EMRmatch range beyond those within the other available EMR selection tools, whose classification criteria are limited to the typical EMR functionality points. You want to know how a given EMR solution will fit into your particular technical environment, and whether the necessary application support is covered by your existing resources. EMRmatch helps you with this important element of your EMR buying decision.
Extended Evaluation – EMRmatch transitions seamlessly over to EMRselect, a sophisticated electronic procurement tool that lets you interface with the EMR vendors you choose. You do not have to contact any vendor until you are ready, and you can remain anonymous to vendors for as long as you choose. As you move closer to a buying decision, you can use EMRselect‘s electronic RFI and RFP features to streamline the final stages of your vendor selection process.
Integration Support – After you have purchased your new EMR system, you can use EMRconsult to identify competent independent consultants who can assist with your installation, configuration and implementation needs. In most cases you can buy these additional services from your software vendor or reseller. EMRconsult simply gives you more choices. More choices increase your odds of finding the best EMR implementation expert for your needs. And finding the right expert can result in better implementation results, within a shorter timeframe, and with reduced impementation expense.
Subscribe in a reader
Tags:Compare EHR, Compare EHR Applications, Compare EHR Software, Compare EHR Solutions, Compare EHR Suites, Compare EHR Vendors, Compare EMR, Compare EMR Applications, Compare EMR Software, Compare EMR Solutions, Compare EMR Suites, Compare EMR Vendors, EHR, EHR Buyer Help, EHR Compare, EHR Evaluation, EHR Reviews, EHR Selection Tool, EHR Solution, Emr, EMR Buyer Help, EMR Compare, EMR Evaluation, EMR Reviews, EMR Selection Tool, Emr Software, EMR Solution, EMR system, Existing Resources, Objective EHR Evaluation, Objective EMR Evaluation, Unbiased EHR Evaluation, Unbiased EMR Evaluation
Posted in Healthcare IT | No Comments »
Tuesday, February 10th, 2009
View the February 20, 2009 UPDATE to this post here.
The Vote – The Senate voted 61-37 to approve an economic stimulus bill that’s expected to cost $838 billion through 2019, according to the latest estimate from the Congressional Budget Office.
Work That Remains – The Senate will have to work with the House to settle differences between the approved Senate version of the bill and the $820 billion House version. Hopefully, those differences will be resolved expeditiously. A finalized version of the bill will be presented to Obama for his signature.
Text of Senate Bill – You can view the text of the Senate bill here.
EHR Incentives – Good news! The EHR incentives under TITLE IV—HEALTH
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, Subtitle A—Medicare Program, remain intact.
Preservation and possible creation of HIT jobs also remains intact. I am very pleased with this outcome. If you are, too, shout out to others by commenting below.
If you do not see a comments window below, click on this post’s title. You DO NOT NEED TO REGISTER in order to comment.
Subscribe in a reader
Tags:Compare Senate Stimulus Bill, Compromise Bill Text, Economic Stimulus Package, EHR, EHR In Compromise Bill, EHR Incentives, Emr, EMR In Compromise Bill, EMR Incentives, Incentives To Adopt EHR, Incentives To Adopt EMR, Meaningful EHR User, Medicare HIT Reimbursements, Midicare HIT Incentives, Senate Approves Economic Stimulus Bill, Senate Stimulus Bill Text, Stimulus Package, Summary Senate Stimulus Bill, Text, Text Of Senate Stimulus Bill
Posted in Healthcare IT | 2 Comments »
Monday, February 9th, 2009
View the February 20, 2009 UPDATE to this post here.
Despite a vote to occur within the Senate in less than 24 hours, the text of consolidated Senate revisions to HR1 is not yet available. However, this from the United States Senate website, updated February 9, 2009. Presumably, this is the most recent (current) version of the Senate amendment affecting incentives available to EHR adopters.
Senate Amendment 570 to HR1 (scroll down to S.A.570) still contains the following language, verbatim, from HR1 regarding incentives for provider adoption of EHR:
“(B) LIMITATIONS ON AMOUNTS OF INCENTIVE PAYMENTS.–
“(i) IN GENERAL.–In no case shall the amount of the incentive payment provided under this paragraph for an eligible professional for a payment year exceed the applicable amount specified under this subparagraph with respect to such eligible professional and such year.
“(ii) AMOUNT.–Subject to clauses (iii) through (v), the applicable amount specified in this subparagraph for an eligible professional is as follows:
“(I) For the first payment year for such professional, $15,000 (or, if the first payment year for such eligible professional is 2011 or 2012, $18,000).
“(II) For the second payment year for such professional, $12,000.
“(III) For the third payment year for such professional, $8,000.
“(IV) For the fourth payment year for such professional, $4,000.
“(V) For the fifth payment year for such professional, $2,000.
“(VI) For any succeeding payment year for such professional, $0.
So, despite the headlines depicting broad HIT spending cuts by the Senate, it appears this little chunk of spending will be carried forward into the compromise bill.
Subscribe in a reader
Tags:2009 Senate Stimulus Bill, Differences Between House And Senate Stimulus Bill, Economic Stimulus Bill Text, EHR, Emr, HIT, Incentives, Politics News, Read Senate Stimulus Bill, Senate Bill, Senate Bill - s. 336, Senate Bills, Senate Stimulus, Senate Stimulus 2009, Senate Stimulus Bill, Senate Stimulus Bill 2009, Senate Stimulus Bill Full Text, Senate Stimulus Bill Text, Stimulus, Stimulus Bill, Stimulus Bill Full Text, Stimulus Bill List, Stimulus Bill Text, Stimulus Bills, Stimulus Package, Stimulus Package Full Text, Stimulus Package Text, Text Of Senate Stimulus Bill, Text Of Stimulus Bill, Us Senate Stimulus, Us Senate Stimulus Bill
Posted in Healthcare IT | No Comments »
Saturday, February 7th, 2009
View the February 20, 2009 UPDATE to this post here.
UPDATE – See the February 9, 2009 UPDATE to this post here.
The current Senate version of HR1, the “American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009″, increases the amount of incentives available for EHR adoption. (Section 4201)
Status Quo Plus More EHR Incentive Dollars For Rural Eligible Professionals
“Eligible professionals” (which does not include “hospital-based professionals”) who are “meaningful EHR users” can receive up to $41,000 in EHR incentives over five (5) years. This provision is identical to the HR1 provision. Adding a new twist, “rural eligible professionals” are eligible for an additional 25% over the amount available to non-rural eligible professionals.
You can view the text of the Senate version of HR1 here. The EHR incentive provisions begin at Page 648.
The Senate will vote on its version of HR1 as early as next Tuesday.
So far, so good, for HIT and EHR within the economic stimulus package.
Subscribe in a reader
Tags:American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, Compare Senate And House Versions, Economic Stimulus Package, EHR, EHR Funding, EHR Incentives, Electronic Health Records, Electronic Medical Records, Emr, EMR Funding, EMR Incentives, HR1, Rural Eligible Professional
Posted in Healthcare IT | No Comments »
Friday, February 6th, 2009
Last month, AHRQ issued a solicitation for proposals for multiple IDIQ/Task Order contracts through which individual Task Orders will be awarded to maintain, serve, and support the AHRQ National Resource Center for Health Information Technology.
Today, AHRQ announced that it has modified the ceiling amount for all contracts (including options) to $300 Million instead of the previously stated $75 Million. Individual ceiling amounts will be established for each base contract awarded based on the anticipated level of work required under each of the following four domain areas:
1. Support for HIT Program Management, Guidance, Assessment and Planning
2. HIT Technical Assistance, Content Development, Program Related Projects and Studies
3. HIT Dissemination, Communication and Marketing
4. HIT Portal Infrastructure Management and Website Design and Usability Support
In addition, AHRQ has extended the due date for receipt of proposals to February 26, 2009, at 12:00 PM EST. Also listed in the amended solicitation are responses to questions that have been received as a result of the Requests for Proposal. View the amended solicitation.
Subscribe in a reader
Tags:Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, AHRQ, Bid Solicitation, Bids, HIT, HIT Communication and Marketing, HIT Content Development, HIT Dissemination, HIT Portal Infrastructure Management, HIT RFP, HIT Website Design and Usability Support, IDIQ/Task Order ontracts, Open HIT RFP, Open HIT RFPs, Support for HIT Program Management
Posted in Healthcare IT | No Comments »
Thursday, February 5th, 2009
View the February 20, 2009 UPDATE to this post here.
ASP EMR To Gain Preference? – According to Bloomberg News, the economic stimulus bill approved by the House last week favors health IT firms that operate on an application service provider model over software vendors.
ASP Less Expensive Up Front – The House’s $819 billion economic stimulus package includes $20+ billion for health IT. The bill would provide financial incentives to physicians over time, rather than upfront, lump sum payments. This means doc’s and hospitals will likely opt for a less-expensive ASP EMR solution, versus investing in a locally-installed software package that is relatively more expensive to buy. Or so Bloomberg’s logic goes.
I Don’t Necessarily Agree – On the surface Bloomberg’s logic seems sound, but let’s face it. There’s a lot more to an EMR buying decision than initial cost.
Internet Interruptions – If I’m a doc’, and I’m about to make the leap to managing my practice electronically, I’m certainly going to think about the reliability of the sytem I choose. What if my internet connection goes down, or the speed of my connection bogs down to a snail’s pace? Am I supposed to stop seeing and scheduling patients, and stop prescribing their med’s, until my connectivity is restored?
Security – With all of the state and federal onus placed on practitioners and healthcare facilities to protect and secure patient health information, is it wise to allow such information to vaporize into the web cloud? I would love to see the indemnification provisions contained in an ASP EMR license agreement and the ASP’s terms of service. If anyone has an example, please do forward it on.
Long-Term Value – The fee basis for many ASP EMR arrangements is tied to revenue. Is it better to make a somewhat larger investment upfront, depreciate it over several years, and own it outright? Or, better to make the smaller upfront investment and share revenue indefinitely? I think many EMR buyers will opt for ownership and control of their EMR system.
Initial Costs – Lastly, another flaw in the Bloomberg analysis is the fact that locally-installed EMR systems (software versus ASP) are just not that expensive. You license the software, maybe buy some additional hardware, and it’s off to the races. For a small office practice, initial cost estimates for an EMR system vary from $3,000 to over $40,000. Certainly, wise buyers will do just fine with investing at the smaller end of this range. In the current House bill, independent (not hospital-based) providers can receive up to $15,000 in 2009, and a lesser amount each year thereafter, during a total incentive period of five (5) years. In my mind, the current incentive figures are more than adequate to support purchase of a locally-installed EMR system.
Subscribe in a reader
Tags:ASP EHR, ASP EMR, ASP EMR Better Than EMR Software, ASP EMR Security, Economic Stimulus Package, EHR, Emr, EMR Software Versus ASP, Health Information Technology, HIT, Stimulus Package Favors ASP EMR Solutions
Posted in Healthcare IT | No Comments »
Wednesday, February 4th, 2009
View the February 20, 2009 UPDATE to this post here.
UPDATE – See the February 9, 2009 UPDATE to this post here.
As the Senate works on its version of the Economic Stimulus Bill, CongressDaily is reporting the following amendments to the House version of the bill.
Reduce HIT Spending – So far, a reduction of the amount of HIT spending and incentives has not been attacked in the Senate. Good news for those of us who work within and touch HIT.
Health Care Disparities – In an effort to eliminate healthcare disparites, this amendment would require that electronic health records collect information on race, ethnicity and gender.
Health Privacy Violations – Changes would allow state attorneys general to file class-action lawsuits against violators of federal health privacy laws, and prohibit states from hiring outside lawyers on a contingency basis to ensure that damages collected are returned to taxpayers.
Data Breach Notification – Changes are aimed at closing loopholes that would in many cases prevent consumers from knowing if their medical information has been improperly accessed.
Quality Initiatives – An amendment that would exempt quality initiatives, such as disease management and care coordination efforts, from a provision that requires the HHS secretary to issue new health care operations rules.
So, thus far, all good news in terms of maintaining substantial funding for HIT. This happens to be the objective that I care about most right now–a good chunk of HIT spending that is cemented into the final bill. We can worry about the peskier of details later, in my opinion.
Subscribe in a reader
Tags:Economic Stimulus Bill, Economic Stimulus HIT, EHR, Emr, HIT, HIT Incentives, HIT Spending, Medicare HIT Incentives, Reduce HIT Spending, Senate Amendments, Senate Version Of Bill
Posted in Healthcare IT | 1 Comment »
Tuesday, February 3rd, 2009
Former Senator Tom Daschle has withdrawn from the nomination to be Secretary of HHS, according to the Associated Press.
Underpaying his taxes, and his ties to healthcare industry market players, apparently did him in. Yesterday’s New York Times editorial calling for his withdrawal from nomination certainly did not help his cause.
So, who will Obama call up to lead the nation’s healthcare reform effort?
YOUR COMMENTS: Let us know what you think by expressing your opinion in the comments section below. You do not need to register in order to comment. If you do not see the comments window below, click on the title of this post.
Subscribe in a reader
Tags:Daschle, Daschle Healthcare Industry Lobbyist, Daschle Ties To Healthcare Industry, Daschle Unpaid Taxes, Daschle Withdraws, Daschle Withdraws From Nomination, Daschle Withdraws From Post, Daschle Withdraws From Secretary Post, HHS, HHS Sectretary, Obama HHS Secretary, Tom Daschle
Posted in Healthcare IT | No Comments »
Tuesday, February 3rd, 2009
Yes, there is FREE EMR software available out there, and one example is VistA. And free means free. There are no strings attached to the free software offer. Extra baggage, yes, but no strings.
What Is VistA?
“Veterans Health Information Systems and Technology Architecture” (VistA) is an enterprise EMR application used throughout the U.S. Department of Veteran Affairs medical system. Because it was developed by federal employees, it is available for free under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). Proprietary versions of VistA are also available (for a fee) from private consultancies who have further developed the architecture and added functional modules. You can run a demo of VistA here, and download your copy of the free FOIA VistA software (including patches, etc.) here.
What’s The Baggage?
VistA uses and is dependent upon the “Massachussetts General Hospital Utility Multi-Programming System” (MUMPS, a/k/a M), which functions as both an operating system and a database, and MUMPS is NOT free. You have to buy it from a vendor. Further, MUMPS was written pre-C, so its syntax and other programming requirements will be unfamiliar to programmers who are versed in the modern programming languages. MUMPS programmers are out there, but their numbers are declining and they are expensive to hire.
Is The Federal Government Pushing Further Private Adoption of VistA? – No. In fact, there have been rumblings over the past two years about moth-balling VistA entirely because of security issues and the goverment’s growing preference to privatize applications like VistA.
Bottom Line – Avoid the temptation of FREE and pass over this option as you consider your EMR options.
Subscribe in a reader
Tags:Compare Free EHR Solutions, Compare Free EMR Solutions, Federal Assistance EHR, Federal Assistance EMR, Free EHR Applications, Free EHR Software, Free EMR Applications, Free EMR Software, VistA
Posted in Healthcare IT | 7 Comments »
Thursday, January 29th, 2009
View the February 20, 2009 UPDATE to this post here.
UPDATE – See the February 9, 2009 UPDATE to this post here.
The House version of the Stimulus Bill passed on January 28, 2009 and is worth some $819 Billion. The Senate will vote on its version of the bill next week, which is worth close to $900 Billion and includes an additional $3 Billion for HIT.
Funding That Will Become Available
The bill creates the “Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act” or the “HITECH Act”. You can view the approved House version of the HITECH Act here (scroll down to Page 30).
Independent Professionals
Under the HITECH Act, “eligible professionals” (which does not include “hospital-based professionals”) who are “meaningful EHR users” can receive up to $41,000 over five (5) years. (Section 4311)
Hospital-Based Professionals
“Hospital-based professionals” are not excluded from incentive payments, but their eligibility and maximum incentives will be extablished through subsequent rulemaking. (Section 4311)
Hospitals
“Eligible hospitals” that are “meaningful EHR users” will receive a “base amount” ($2 Million) plus a “discharge amount” (based on annual Mecidare discharges), times a “transition factor” applied over five (5) years. The transition factor starts at unity (1) for the first year, and declines to zero (0) in the fifth year. (Section 4312)
Positive Effect
There will always be naysayers and detractors, but to me these are substantial sums, and they demonstrate the federal government’s commitment to HIT (though mixed with its commitment to economic stimulus). These monies will no doubt save many HIT jobs–not just within hospitals and clinics, but across HIT vendors and consultancies–and in the best of worlds, the dollars may be sufficient to create new HIT jobs over time.
NOTE: The figures above are based on my quick read of the House version of the HITECH Act, which has not yet been enacted. My interpretation of this version may not be accurate, and in all events, all of its provisions are subject to further revision and amendment prior to enactment.
Subscribe in a reader
Tags:4311, 4312, Economic Stimulus, EHR, Eligible Hospitals, Eligible Professionals, Emr, Health Information Technology, HIT, Meaningful EHR User, Meaningful EMR User, Medicare, Stimulus Bill
Posted in Healthcare IT | No Comments »
