
- Image via Wikipedia
As yet undecided, the incentives may take the form of increased reimbursements, lump-sum payments, in-kind services, or some combination of these.
You can view the entire text of Maryland’s HB 706 here.
Tags: EHR, EHR Incentives, EHR Reimbursements, Emr, EMR Incentives, EMR Reimbursements, Health Insurer EHR Adoption Incentives, Health Insurer EMR Adoption Incentives, Incentives, Maryland, Maryland EHR Adoption Incentives, Maryland EMR Adoption Incentives
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=66b984c4-66ea-442f-9e2f-ca0e533bf020)

My thought exactly. At first I thought I was just being cynical, but the more I think about this, it really is just a tax on health insurers that will be passed on to individuals and their employers. In fact, I venture to say the cost of these insurer-paid incentives will be passed on dollar-for-dollar, and then some. Yet another reason to increase rates, co-pays and deductibles, and reduce coverage overall.
This is not a solution. It’s like trying to put out a fire by throwing gasoline on it.
On the surface, this type of law looks appealing–additional incentive for healthcare providers to adopt EHR.
However, because health insurers will merely pass these costs on to employer sponsors and insureds, its really just a tax on health insurance. And the incidence of this tax will be on those who increasingly cannot afford health insurance: employers and employees.
I’m happy to see Maryland taking a pro-active approach, but the major goal of healthcare reform is to REDUCE costs, not to increase them.