Posts Tagged ‘Meaningful Use’

EHR Incentive Program Registration

Friday, December 24th, 2010

EHR Incentive ProgramThe Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) has announced the opening of registration for the EHR Incentive Program. Eligible Professionals and Eligible Hospitals may register on and after January 3, 2011. You can learn more about the EHR Incentive Program, eligibility requirements, registration requirements, and attestation requirements here.

CMS is encouraging Eligible Professionals and Eligible Hospitals to register as soon as possible. It is possible to register before installation or implementation of an EHR system.

EMR “Meaningful Use” Defined By ONCHIT

Tuesday, January 5th, 2010

Doctor EMR PC

Long-Awaited Criteria – ONCHIT has finally issued regulations that define “meaningful use” of EMRs, the major qualifying criterion for the EMR adoption incentives provided by ARRA.

You can view the text of the regulations here.

Stage 1 criteria take effect in 2011. Stage 2 criteria will apply in 2013, and Stage 3 criteria in 2015 (both to be defined at a later date).

Major Elements of the Meaningful Use Rules:

CPOE

Practices: Use CPOE for orders involving medications, laboratory, radiology, and referrals.
Hospitals: medications, laboratory, radiology, blood bank, PT, OT, RT, rehab, dialysis, consults, and discharge and transfer.

Orders do not have to be sent electronically to the fulfilling department (lab, pharmacy, etc.)
Practices must enter 80% of their total orders directly by the clinician into the CPOE system. Hospitals must have 10% of all orders entered by CPOE.

Clinical Checking of Orders

Real-time screening (drug-drug interactions and drug-allergy contraindications), formulary check, user ability to maintain screening rules, track user responses to alerts.

Problem List

Longitudinal current and active diagnoses coded in ICD-9-CM or SNOMED CT.
80% of unique patients must have at least one coded problem/diagnosis, with “none” being an allowed entry (hospitals and practices).

E-Prescribing

Practices only.
Must send 75% of non-controlled substance prescriptions electronically.

Active Medication List

80% of unique patients must have at least one coded entry, with “none” being an allowed entry (hospitals and practices).

Medication Allergy List

Longitudinal with allergy history.
80% of unique patients must have at least one coded entry, with “none” being an allowed entry (hospitals and practices).

Demographics

Practices: preferred language, insurance type, gender, race, ethnicity, and data of birth.
Hospitals: all of the above plus date and cause of death if applicable.
80% of patients must have demographics recorded as structured data

Vital Signs

Height, weight, BP, BMI, growth charts for patients 2-20 years old, temperature, pulse.
80% of patients aged 2 and over must have blood pressure and BMI entered.
Children 2-20 must have a growth chart.

Smoking Status

Record if current smoker, former smoker, or never smoked.
Must be recorded for 80% of patients.

Structured Lab Results

Display results, translate LOINC codes, allow maintenance based on new results.
Must record as structured EHR data 50% of all results that are delivered in positive/negative or numeric format.

Patient Lists

Allow user to select, sort, retrieve, and output patient lists based on demographics, medications, and conditions.

Report Quality Measures to CMS and States

Calculate, display, and submit quality measure results

Patient Reminders

Practices only: issue based on patient preferences, demographics, conditions, and medication list.

Five Clinical Decision Support Rules

Beyond drug screening, based on demographics: diagnoses, lab results, or medication list. Real-time alerts and suggestions based on evidence. Track response to alerts.

Eligibility

Allow user to record and display based on eligibility response from insurer.
Must cover 80% of unique patients.

Submit Claims

Must submit 80% of all claims filed electronically.

Electronic Copy of Health Information to Patients

Allow user to create an electronic copy of test results, problem list, medication list, medication allergy list, immunizations, and procedures. Hospitals must also provide a discharge summary but not procedures.
Must provide an electronic copy of health information to requesting patients within 48 hours.

Electronic Copy of Discharge Instructions

Hospitals only.
Must provide electronically to 80% of discharged patients who request them.

Timely Patient Access to Health Information

Practices only: diagnostic results, problem list, medication list, medication allergy list, immunizations, and procedures. Within 96 hours of availability.
Must provide to 10% of unique patients.

Clinical Summary of Each Office Visit

Practices only: diagnostic results, medication list, procedures, problem list, immunizations.
Must provide for 80% of office visits.

Information Exchange

Enable electronic sending and receiving of diagnostic test results, problem list, medication list, medication allergy list, immunizations, and procedures. Hospital requirements also include a discharge summary.
Must conduct at least one test of exchanging information.

Medication Reconciliation

Compare and merge two or more medication lists into a single list that can be displayed in real time.
Must be performed in 80% of encounters and care transitions.

Submit Data to Immunization Registries

Must conduct at least one test of submitting information.

Submit Lab Results to Public Health Agencies

Hospitals only.
Must conduct at least one test of submitting information.

Submit Syndrome Surveillance Data to Public Health Agencies

Must conduct at least one test of submitting information.

Protect Electronic Patient Information

Unique identifier, emergency access for authorized users, session timeout, encryption where preferred, encryption when exchanging information, maintain audit logs, provide integrity check for recipient of electronically transmitted information, verify user identities and access privileges, record PHI disclosures.
Must conduct a security risk analysis and implement security updates.

ONCHIT Releases Operating Plan for ARRA EHR Incentives

Tuesday, May 26th, 2009

Saving For a Rainy DayThe Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT (ONCHIT) has released its operating plan for implementing the health IT provisions included in the federal stimulus package. But don’t get your hopes up. The plan is disappointingly brief and lacking in detail . . . more along the lines of “here’s what we’re going to do once we get started.” C’mon people! The clock is ticking!! Get with it.

Sadly, it’s looking more and more like the HIT provisions of ARRA will not have their intended effect: stimulating the economy. By the time ONCHIT releases its rules and guidelines, the absence of which has frozen EHR implementations, the U.S. economy will be well on its way to recovery. Sadder still, legislation that was designed to create spending has actually slowed spending.

Once again, the best laid plans of governement have gotten sidetracked in bureaucracy. Maybe we should save these EHR incentive dollars until a more considered plan can be developed.

You can view ONCHIT’s Operating Plan here.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Federal EHR Incentives – Carrot or Brick Wall?

Wednesday, May 6th, 2009

carrotBusiness is slow for EMR/EHR software providers at a time when business should be booming. With over $20 billion of funding available in the form of reimbursements, we would expect healthcare providers to be waiting in line for their EMR/EHR implementations. Ironically, the very legislation that created this generous funding also included provisions that have given doc’s and hospitals pause. Actually, it’s more than just pause. It’s outright paralysis.

The eligibility for federal dollars is tied to “meaningful use” of “qualified” EHR sytems, which sounds simple enough. But now–nearly four months after passage of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA)–no one knows what meaningful use is, and no one knows what a qualified EHR system is. We have some clues, but we have no official declaration.

brick-wallIf the Obabma adminstration is serious about HIT and EHRs, and it wants to see the economy benefit from this category of HIT spending (a secondary, but nonetheless important, objective of the funding), then the federal government needs to act quickly and decisively to define the eligibility criteria. If this cannot be accomplished quickly, then we’ll lose the economic stimulus feature of the plan–the economy is already starting to improve because of other measures taken and not taken. And if we miss the economic stimulus train, we might as well wait until a more considered approach can be taken with respect to HIT, including EHRs, in the broader scheme of healthcare reform.

What do you think? Is the lack of certainty with respect to EHR system eligibility criteria the main reason the rate of EHR adoption has not increased after passage of ARRA? What can the feds do to expedite development and promulgation of the eligibility criteria?

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Getting the Federal EHR Incentive Dollars – What You Can Do Now

Monday, April 13th, 2009

flag-dollarUnder the American Reinvestment and Recovery Act (ARRA), healthcare providers will receive an estimated $30 Billion worth of incentives and reimbursements tied to their adoption and use of Electronic Health Records (EHRs). By anyone’s standards, this is not a small chunk of change. At the small end of the scale, individual physicians could receive as much as $60,000 over time, and larger hospitals sevaral million dollars over time.

Except for the largest hospitals and clinic groups, healthcare providers have been reluctant to move substantially toward a paperless environment for many reasons, chief among them, prohibitive cost (initial cost, cost over time, and a questionable return on investment). With broader policy objectives in mind, Congress sought to address the cost side of the equation through the EHR incentives contained in ARRA. With all of this money available, we would expect to see healthcare providers beating down the doors of EHR providers. But they aren’t–at least not yet. Here’s why.

Uncertainty – ARRA attached eligibility criteria to the EMR incentives and reimbursements, but it did not define all criteria with precision. For example, we know that a healthcare provider must demonstrate “meaningful use” of its “certified” EHR system in order to qualify for funding, and that “meaningful use” includes both EHR system attributes, as well as deployed use by a provider. We’ve been given a vague understanding of the required system attributes (e.g., e-prescribe, order entry, interoperability requirements), but we do not yet have a comprehensive list or definition. The same is true of the certification requirement.

Moving Ahead in the Face of Uncertainty – If you are looking at buying your first EHR system, or expanding your existing EHR system–in either case, with a view to securing federal reimbursement dollars–you have to get over your fear of the uncertain and unknown. Because of the aggressive adoption timeframes established, you do not have the luxury of time to indulge in decision paralysis. You have to start your planning process now.

Strategy – Instead of focusing on what you do NOT know with certainty at the moment, focus on what you DO know with some degree of certainty. Second, transfer as much “uncertainty risk” as possible to others.

For example, we know with certainty now that your qualifying EHR system must include electronic prescribing capability and automated order entry. If you are buying a new EHR system, or you are attempting to qualify your existing EHR system, you will need these functional capabilities. The same is true of the interoperabity feature. We don’t know exactly what sort of interoperability will be required, but we know some form of interoperability will be required.

Risk Transfer – Realize that EHR vendors are experiencing the same pain as you regarding the uncertainty over qualifying criteria for EHR systems. And just like you, they’re not in a postition to sit on their hands until the regulatory dust settles.

Most EMR vendors will be willing to extend broad assurances and warranties regarding their products’ future compliance with EHR qualifying criteria as they are handed down over time. If you ask for these types of assurances and warranties from your candiate EHR vendors, you will probably get them.

Focusing on what you know with certainty at present, and realizing that you can transfer a good deal of uncertainy risk to your EHR vendor, might allow you to begin a meaningful EHR system planning process now.

Stay Informed – Watch for regulatory developments and pronouncements as they are handed down in the coming weeks and months. If you don’t have time to track these on your own, plug into the many free resources out there. Chances are good that many of the professional organizations you already belong to are tracking this information for you. Think about subscribing to their RSS feeds or consolidated weekly updates.

Role of Consultants – If you have a solo practice, or you’re part of a small group practice, you may not have time to investigate your EHR options. If this is your situation, think about hiring a consultant to evaluate your practice vis-a-vis the EHR options available to you. Many good HIT consultants will conduct a “needs analysis” and make recommendations for a smallish fee.

  Subscribe in a reader

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]